Evaluating Questions in Context
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present an evaluation methodology and a system for ranking questions within the context of a multimodal tutorial dialogue. Such a framework has applications for automatic question selection and generation in intelligent tutoring systems. To create this ranking system we manually author candidate questions for specific points in a dialogue and have raters assign scores to these questions. To explore the role of question type in scoring, we annotate dialogue turns with labels from the DISCUSS dialogue move taxonomy. Questions are ranked using a SVM-regression model trained with features extracted from the dialogue context, the candidate question, and the human ratings. Evaluation shows that our system’s rankings correlate with human judgments in question rank-
منابع مشابه
Evaluating the Residents’ Opinions of the Neighborhood about the Inter-productive Structures in Historical Context of Julfa, Isfahan
Isfahan’s Julfa neighborhood has been one of the valuable historical neighborhoods related to the Safavid era. It is different from other neighborhoods of the city due to the residents’ cultural-religious differences. Interventions in historical contexts are taking place with a variety of approaches around the world. The present study was conducted to answer this question: What should the inter...
متن کاملEvaluating Answers to Reading Comprehension Questions in Context
Ramon Ziai1, Niels Ott1, Detmar Meurers2 1Sonderforschungsbereich 833, 2Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen . .Research Questions . • What linguistic representations can be used robustly and efficiently in an automatic meaning comparison? • What is the role of context and how can we utilize knowledge about it in comparing meaning automatically? Context heremeans questions and r...
متن کاملThe Development and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Reproductive Health PhD Program in Iran Based on CIPP Evaluation Model
Introduction: An appropriate and accurate tool is one of the most important factors of a valid evaluation. The purpose of this study was to construct a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate reproductive health PhD program in Iran based on the CIPP Evaluation Model. Methods: This study was conducted in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in year two thousand thirteen. The questionnaire d...
متن کاملInvestigating the Effect of Changing Answers in Multiple-Choice Questions of Reading and Listening Tests in EFL Context
This study investigates whether the practice of answer changing on multiple-choice questions (MCQs) is beneficial for Iranian students’ overall test performance in EFL context. Several studies have shown that answer changing in multiple choice examinations is generally beneficial for improving scores. On the other hand, some studies have indicated that answer changing in multiple choice examina...
متن کاملProceduralization and Transfer of Linguistics Knowledge as a Result of Form-focused Output and Input Practice
This study compared the effects of two types of form-focused tasks on proceduralization and transfer of linguistics knowledge in case of English modals. All participants of the study attended pretests, posttests and delayed posttests. The procedural comprehension and production knowledge were measured through the groups’ performance on a timed dual task test that resembled the context of practi...
متن کاملEvaluating EFL Learners’ Philosophical Mentality through their Answers to Philosophical Questions: Using Smith’s Framework
Given the role philosophical mentality can fulfill in bringing individuals the essential skills of wisdom and well thinking, the present paper, by applying Smith’s (2007) theoretical framework, strived to explore the extent philosophic-mindedness exists among the participants. Considering the fact that, a philosophic mind begets philosophical answers, the participants’ philosophical thi...
متن کامل